The bulk update request #2 is active.

create implication 4_males (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_males (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_males (5) -> group (12)
create implication 4_females (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_females (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_females (0) -> group (12)
create implication 4_unknown (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_unknown (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_unknown (1) -> group (12)
create implication 4_herms (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_herms (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_herms (0) -> group (12)
create implication 4_maleherms (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_maleherms (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_maleherms (0) -> group (12)
create implication 4_gynomorphs (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_gynomorphs (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_gynomorphs (0) -> group (12)
create implication 4_andromorphs (0) -> group (12)
create implication 5_andromorphs (0) -> group (12)
create implication 6+_andromorphs (0) -> group (12)

Reason: Are gender count tags global (entire image, even in multiple images situation), or local (per scene, like e6 (and possibly here's) character count tags)? It should follow the character count tags right?

Tangential question, Is 3+ a group or 4+? trio definitely implies group

EDIT: The bulk update request #2 (forum #33) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.

@0_0 said:
Are gender count tags global (entire image, even in multiple images situation), or local (per scene, like e6 (and possibly here's) character count tags)? It should follow the character count tags right?

Like e6, per scene

@0_0 said:
Tangential question, Is 3+ a group or 4+? trio definitely implies group

I was mirroring e6 but I'm not really sure if that's desirable, or if it would be better to leave trio on its own, and have group be 4+

The bulk update request #5 is active.

remove implication trio (29) -> group (12)

Reason: The group is 4+ option

EDIT: The bulk update request #5 (forum #39) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.

What happened to this BUR
BUR #5
The bulk update request #5 is active.

remove implication trio (29) -> group (12)

@0_0 said:
Reason: The group is 4+ option

I'm honestly not sure what happened here, that post has no BUR associated with it, but the BUR is associated with that post
So one side failed while the other side succeeded, who knows what happened but I'll look into it later (if you could mention it in Topic: General Bug Reports / Feature Requests that would be great)

The bulk update request #2 (forum #33) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.

The bulk update request #5 (forum #39) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.

The tag alias #1293 3_male -> 3_males has been approved.

Reason: Testing aliases in different forums
Also probably need to alias [count>2]_[gender]

EDIT: The tag alias 3_male -> 3_males (forum #51) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.

The tag alias 3_male -> 3_males (forum #51) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.