The bulk update request #2 is active.
implicate 4_males -> group
implicate 5_males -> group
implicate 6+_males -> group
implicate 4_females -> group
implicate 5_females -> group
implicate 6+_females -> group
implicate 4_unknown -> group
implicate 5_unknown -> group
implicate 6+_unknown -> group
implicate 4_herms -> group
implicate 5_herms -> group
implicate 6+_herms -> group
implicate 4_maleherms -> group
implicate 5_maleherms -> group
implicate 6+_maleherms -> group
implicate 4_gynomorphs -> group
implicate 5_gynomorphs -> group
implicate 6+_gynomorphs -> group
implicate 4_andromorphs -> group
implicate 5_andromorphs -> group
implicate 6+_andromorphs -> group
Reason: Are gender count tags global (entire image, even in multiple images situation), or local (per scene, like e6 (and possibly here's) character count tags)? It should follow the character count tags right?
Tangential question, Is 3+ a group or 4+? trio definitely implies group
EDIT: The bulk update request #2 (forum #33) has been approved by @Donovan_DMC.
Updated by System